McBride Law Blog


Tagged Posts: transportation’

Employee or Independent Contractor? That Is the Question (Part II)

May 5, 2016

This is the second in a two-part blog on Cotter v. Lyft, a California case involving misclassification of drivers.  Read about the “whys” of the case in our first post, Employee or Independent Contractor? That Is the Question.

In the settlement agreement, Lyft agreed to pay more than $12 million ($12,250,000 to be exact, for all monetary benefits and payments to the settlement class, fees and expenses, taxes, and so forth), as well as revise its terms of service with drivers, including the following:

  • Lyft will modify the at-will termination provisions in its terms of service to remove Lyft’s ability to deactivate a driver’s account for any reason and to replace those provisions with language detailing specific actions that will constitute a breach of contract by a driver and/or result in termination of the driver’s terms of service;
  • Lyft will modify the arbitration provision in its terms of service to state explicitly that Lyft will pay for the arbitration fees and costs for claims brought by either party based on an alleged employment relationship between Lyft and a driver, Lyft’s deactivation of a driver’s account, termination provisions, or fares or hourly rates;
  • Lyft will create a “favorite driver” option that results in some benefit to drivers who Lyft passengers designate as a “favorite”; and
  • Lyft will modify its smartphone app to provide drivers with additional information about a potential Lyft passenger prior to a driver accepting any ride request from the passenger.
Read the rest

Employee or Independent Contractor? That Is the Question (Part I)

April 28, 2016

As part of our previous blog series titled Uber and Lyft Drivers Might Be Employees, Not Independent Contractors, Under California Law, we wrote about Cotter v. Lyft, a California case involving claims of misclassified drivers.[1]  At the heart of this case was the question of whether Lyft drivers were independent contractors or employees under California law.  Why should this matter to a business?  Because the determination has its consequences– under California law, for instance, employees are entitled to certain benefits and protections, whereas independent contracts are not.… Read the rest

Uber and Lyft Drivers Might Be Employees, Not Independent Contractors, Under California Law

September 10, 2015

Cotter v. Lyft.

In Cotter v. Lyft, a district court case involving similar facts as in Berwick v. Uber, the court acknowledged at the outset that Lyft drivers didn’t seem much like employees or independent contractors.[1]  On one hand, the court noted, Lyft drivers, unlike typical employees, work as little or as much as they want and can schedule their driving around their other activities; on the other hand, Lyft drivers, unlike typical independent contractors, use no special skill when they give rides, and their work is central, not tangential, to Lyft’s business.… Read the rest

Uber and Lyft Drivers Might Be Employees, Not Independent Contractors, Under California Law

September 3, 2015

Berwick v. Uber.

In 2014, Uber and a middleman Rasier-CA LLC (collectively referred to as “Uber”) employed Berwick as a driver in San Francisco, California, under the terms of a written agreement.[1]  The agreement provided, in relevant part, that Berwick was entitled to accept, reject, and select among service requests and that Berwick was to perform accepted requests in accordance with certain rules, which include, among other things:

  • provide and maintain liability insurance and vehicle(s) approved by Uber that meet certain standards;
  • accept a service fee determined and remitted by Uber, and nothing else (e.
Read the rest

Uber Wins Dismissal of Lawsuit Filed by Cab Companies in Connecticut

September 1, 2015

Previously, we wrote about Berwick v. Uber[1] and Cotter v. Lyft[2] (available here), two recent cases involving tech giants Uber and Lyft, on the question of whether their drivers should be considered employees or independent contractors under California law.  Depending on the outcome of the cases, Uber and Lyft will likely face a litany of similar lawsuits in other jurisdictions, which many say could significantly affect the ride-sharing companies’ business models.

As it turns out, labor and employment issues are not the only legal issues that Uber has to deal with. … Read the rest

Uber and Lyft Drivers Might Be Employees, Not Independent Contractors, Under California Law

August 27, 2015

Employee or Independent Contractor?

Business owners hire people all the time.  Depending on their status as an employee or independent contractor, however, the law treats them differently, affecting all facets of the relationship, including wages, taxes, etc.  Employers who misclassify workers as independent contracts can end up with substantial tax bills and face penalties for failing to pay employment taxes and for failing to file required tax forms,[1] so it is important that business owners understand the difference between employees and independent contractors.… Read the rest

All postings are intended to be planning tools to familiarize readers with some of the high-level issues discussed therein. No posting is intended to be a comprehensive discussion and additional details should be discussed with your transaction planners including attorneys, accountants, consultants, bankers and other business planners who can provide advice for your circumstances. This article should not be treated as legal advice to any person or entity.